Hallman v. Thompson Tractor Company Inc
| Debra Hallman |
| Thompson Tractor Company Inc |
| 7:2021cv01423 |
| October 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER Telephone Status Conference scheduled for 12/28/21 is RESET for 12/30/2021 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden. The parties are directed to call 866-390-1828 and use access code 9262283 at designated time. The conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on December 14, 2021. (ASL)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by John W Smith T on behalf of Thompson Tractor Company Inc (Smith T, John)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 12/2/2021. (ASL)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order for Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than January 10, 2022. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a randomly drawn district judge without further order after January 10, 2022. A telephone status conference with the magistrate judge is hereby SET for 11:00 AM on Tuesday, December 28, 2021. The parties are directed to call 866-390-1828 access code 9262283 at designated time. The conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 12/2/2021. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 4
ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Thompson Tractor Company Inc.(Griffin, Riley)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Thompson Tractor Company Inc. mailed certified mail (KAM)
|
|
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3951276. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Thompson Tractor Company Inc, filed by Debra Hallman.(KEK). (Schatz, David)
|
|
Filing 2
Request for service by certified mail filed by Debra Hallman. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Thompson Tractor Company Inc, filed by Debra Hallman.(KEK)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hallman v. Thompson Tractor Company Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Debra Hallman | |
| Represented By: | David Jeremy Schatz |
| Represented By: | Raymond Christopher Foushee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Thompson Tractor Company Inc | |
| Represented By: | John W Smith T |
| Represented By: | Riley Phillips Griffin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
