Mosley v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al

Mosley v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al

Case Number:	1:2004cv00435
Filed:	July 2, 2004
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office:	Mobile Office
Presiding Judge:	Kristi K. DuBose (MJ)
Presiding Judge:	William H. Steele
Nature of Suit:	Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 9, 2005	Filing 30 ORDER REOPENING CASE: granting 26 Motion for Reconsideration and VACATING two documents: 24 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment and 25 Judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) on the ground of clear error, to-wit: Both were based on defendants' mi srepresentation that plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies, when in fact all parties now agree that she has done so. This action is hereby REINSTATED to the court's active docket. The following deadlines have been set: a succes sive Rule 56 motion must be filed on or before5/20/05, Final PRETRIAL CONFERENCE is set for 2:30 p.m. on 7/12/05, BENCH TRIAL will be set during the August 2005 trial term, and the disclosure of information regarding the evidence that each party may present at trial is to be made on or before 7/1/05. Finally, plaintiff's Request, doc. 29, for an order requiring defendants to pay her "past gum and dental and [her] future bills" is DENIED insofar as it seeks to interpose new causes of action, and is MOOTto the extent it reiterates claims previously asserted herein. Signed by Judge William H. Steele on 5/6/05. Copies to parties 5/9/05. (mpp)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 9, 2005

Filing 30 ORDER REOPENING CASE: granting 26 Motion for Reconsideration and VACATING two documents: 24 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment and 25 Judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) on the ground of clear error, to-wit: Both were based on defendants' mi srepresentation that plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies, when in fact all parties now agree that she has done so. This action is hereby REINSTATED to the court's active docket. The following deadlines have been set: a succes sive Rule 56 motion must be filed on or before5/20/05, Final PRETRIAL CONFERENCE is set for 2:30 p.m. on 7/12/05, BENCH TRIAL will be set during the August 2005 trial term, and the disclosure of information regarding the evidence that each party may present at trial is to be made on or before 7/1/05. Finally, plaintiff's Request, doc. 29, for an order requiring defendants to pay her "past gum and dental and [her] future bills" is DENIED insofar as it seeks to interpose new causes of action, and is MOOTto the extent it reiterates claims previously asserted herein. Signed by Judge William H. Steele on 5/6/05. Copies to parties 5/9/05. (mpp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mosley v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?