Johnson v. Hooks

Case Number: 1:2006cv00740
Filed: October 31, 2006
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Mobile Office
Referring Judge: Sonja F. Bivins
Presiding Judge: Kristi K. DuBose
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 4, 2009 22 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Gregory Allen Johnson, recommending that the petition be denied without prejudice as this Court does not have jurisdiction to consider the merits of Petitioner's claim due to hs failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 6/4/09. (cmj) (copy mailed to petitioner)
May 8, 2009 21 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Gregory Allen Johnson, recommending that the petition be denied without prejudice as this Court does not have jurisdiction to consider the merits of Petitioner's claim due to hs failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (The Court will construe Petitioner's 254 as one brought pursuant to 2241) Objections to R&R due by 6/1/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 5/8/09. (copy mailed) (cmj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Hooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?