Scurtu et al v. International Student Exchange et al
| Cornelia Grozav and Lina Scurtu |
| International Student Exchange, Wendco, Corp. and Hospitality And Catering Management Services |
| 1:2007cv00410 |
| June 5, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Baldwin |
| Sonja F. Bivins |
| William H. Steele |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
176
ORDER denying 175 Motion to Vacate, or, in the Alternative, to Modify Arbitration Award. The arbitrator's award entered on January 25, 2012 and clarified on July11, 2012 is confirmed. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 9/13/2012. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
172
Order granting 171 MOTION to Withdraw filed by Hospitality And Catering Management Services. (Attorney Thomas Jay Woodford terminated) HCMS is ordered by 7/6/2012 to notify the Court via notice of appearance the name of counsel it has reta ined to represent its interest in this action. Plaintiffs are ordered to file a notice in this District Court attaching a copy of the arbitrators ruling and final judgment. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 6/19/2012. Copy mailed to Paul Cohen, Hospitality & Catering Services, Inc., 21150 Canalport Avenue, Suite 3-A1, Chicago, IL 60608. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
154
Order re: 153 MOTION to Reopen Case and Set Trial Date; Plaintiffs' Motion for Contempt filed by Cornelia Grozav, Lina Scurtu. The Motion for Contempt is denied as further set out in Order. In light of the foregoing considerations, and the dea rth of evidence that the parties havemade any good-faith effort to resolve their differences concerning the HCMS settlement before once again rushing to this Court for intercession, counsel for plaintiffs and HCMS are ordered to meet in person (preferably with the arbitrators presence), to confer in good faith concerning thestatus of the settlement, and to file a joint status report on or before November 15, 2011. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 10/26/2011. (mbp)
|
|
Filing
135
Order re: 125 Renewed Motion to Dismiss filed by Wendco, Corp., Hospitality And Catering Management Services. Plaintiffs are ordered by 3/3/2011 to file a supplemental submission regarding their inability to pay (as set out). Alternatively, plaintiffs may satisfy their obligations under this Order by making a sufficient payment to the arbitrator & by filing proof to that effect by the 3/3/2011 deadline. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 2/11/2011. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
124
Order re: 123 Status Report. If subsequent monthly status reports do not include an adequate showing to address the concerns set out, this Court will not hesitate to issue a show cause order to plaintiffs to explain why their conduct in the aftermath of the July 27 Order does not warrant imposition of sanctions, up to and including dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 10/18/10. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
118
Order denying 111 MOTION Proceed with Claims in Judicial Forum; denying 112 MOTION to Dismiss; denying 115 MOTION to Strike. The referral to the arbitrator remains in place & defendants are ordered to continue filing monthly status reports, on or before the third Friday of each month. Plaintiffs must make their contractually required payment of $1,332.00 to the arbitrator's retainer fund no later than August 26, 2010. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 7/27/10. (tgw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
