Mobile Alabama Associates, LLC v. Hoeppner Construction Corporation
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 3, 2011
JUDGMENT in favor of Hoeppner Construction Corporation against Mobile Alabama Associates, LLC as follows: Original Judgment plus pre-judgment interest in the amount of $521,854.45, plus 12% interest since March 19, 2009; Attorney's fees and costs in the amount of $390,267.05, plus interest in the amount of 12% running from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 10/3/2011. copies to parties. (sdb)
|April 22, 2011
ORDER denying 111 motion of MAA for renewed judgment as a matter of law or alternatively for new trial; granting Hoeppner's 121 motion for leave to supplement; finding that the amounts requested for attorneys' fees, expenses and pre-jud gment interest (Docs. 109 , 121 , 122 ) should be awarded; and directing Hoeppner to file a response to this order further detailing or explaining the amounts requested for post-judgment interest, along with a proposed order as set out. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 4/22/2011. (mab)
|March 18, 2009
JUDGMENT in favor of Hoeppner Construction Corporation against Mobile Alabama Associates, LLC as to Plf's claims & as to its counter-claim in the amount of $422,196.05 plus fees, costs & interest to be determined by the court after further submission by the parties. Plf's claims against Dft are DISMISSED W/PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 3/18/09. (tot)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?