Wallace v. Kentucky Fried Chicken
Plaintiff: Jeff Wallace
Defendant: Kentucky Fried Chicken
Case Number: 1:2008cv00248
Filed: May 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office: P.I.: Other Office
County: Clarke
Presiding Judge: Kristi K. DuBose
Presiding Judge: Sonja F. Bivins
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER entered granting 15 Motion to Remand to the Circuit Court of Clarke County, Alabama. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 10/9/08. (mca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wallace v. Kentucky Fried Chicken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeff Wallace
Represented By: Brian P. Strength
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kentucky Fried Chicken
Represented By: Jason Robert Watkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?