Lawrence v. Moore et al
| Keith Aquia Lawrence |
| Bobby Moore, Lou Thomas, Virgil Chapman, Carl Ollison, Renetta Chapman, Edward Wright, Lisa Penny and Faye Shaper |
| 1:2008cv00277 |
| May 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Prison Condition Office |
| Mobile |
| Sonja F. Bivins |
| William H. Steele |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
JUDGMENT: Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous. Defendants Virgil Chapman, Renatta Chapman, Faye Shaper, Edward Wright, Carl Ollison, Lou Thomas are dismissed. The claim against Bobby Moore for denial of priviledges is dismissed. Signed by Judge William H. Steele on 12/9/09. Copy mailed to plaintiff & ADOC. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
12
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Keith Aquia Lawrence stating it is recommended that, prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii), that: 1. Defendants Virgil Chapman, Renatta Chapman, Faye Sh aper, Edward Wright, Carl Ollison, Lou Thomas and Bobby Moore bedismissed, and 2. Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief be dismissed with prejudice as frivolous. Service of process shall proceed with respect to Defendants Moore and Penny. Objections to R&R due by 11/5/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 10/22/09. Copies to parties on 10/23/09. (mpp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
