Hudnall v. Culliver et al

Hudnall v. Culliver et al

Plaintiff:	James J. Hudnall, Sr.
Defendant:	Grantt Culliver and Donna Earnshaw
Case Number:	1:2008cv00605
Filed:	October 15, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office:	Prison Condition Office
County:	Mobile
Presiding Judge:	Kristi K. DuBose
Presiding Judge:	Bert W. Milling
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 1, 2009	Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by James J. Hudnall, Sr., recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/31/09. (copy to plaintiff) (cmj)
March 19, 2009	Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by James J. Hudnall, Sr., recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915. Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees was previously granted. (Doc. 4). However, in light of the findings herein, the October 22, 2008, Order is hereby WITHDRAWN,and Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees(Doc. 3) is DENIED. The Clerk is ORDERED to return the $16.66 partial filing fee to Plaintiff. (Doc. 5). Objections to R&R due by 4/13/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 3/17/09. (copy to plaintiff, copy to Finance) (cmj)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 1, 2009

Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by James J. Hudnall, Sr., recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/31/09. (copy to plaintiff) (cmj)

March 19, 2009

Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by James J. Hudnall, Sr., recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915. Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees was previously granted. (Doc. 4). However, in light of the findings herein, the October 22, 2008, Order is hereby WITHDRAWN,and Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees(Doc. 3) is DENIED. The Clerk is ORDERED to return the $16.66 partial filing fee to Plaintiff. (Doc. 5). Objections to R&R due by 4/13/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 3/17/09. (copy to plaintiff, copy to Finance) (cmj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hudnall v. Culliver et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: James J. Hudnall, Sr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Grantt Culliver
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Donna Earnshaw
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?