Trustmark National Bank v. Kennedy

Plaintiff: Trustmark National Bank
Defendant: Harold Elton Kennedy
Case Number: 1:2009cv00751
Filed: November 16, 2009
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Mobile Office
County: Baldwin
Referring Judge: Katherine P. Nelson
Presiding Judge: William H. Steele
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 23, 2009 13 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE directing the plaintiff to Show Cause by 11/27/2009 why this action should not be dismissed for want of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge William H. Steele on 11/23/09. Copy mailed to Harold Elton Kennedy to the address as set out. (tgw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trustmark National Bank v. Kennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustmark National Bank
Represented By: David C. Hannan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harold Elton Kennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?