Oden v. Vilsack et al
| Ferrell Oden |
| Tom Vilsack, The Peoples Bank of Greensboro, Michael Harrow Realty, Harris Coleman, Jr. and Michael Harrow |
| 1:2010cv00212 |
| April 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Charles R. Butler |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
172
JUDGMENT in favor of Ferrell Oden against Tom Vilsack; in favor of Dwight E Jefferson against Ferrell Oden. The USDA shall pay all sums due to Oden into the Clerk of Court, who is directed to then distribute funds to Jefferson, with the remaining amount to be distributed to Oden in the care of his attorneys.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 8/12/2013. (cmj)
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER entered on the Motion for Attorneys Fees and Cost (Doc.158) filed by Plaintiff Ferrell Oden. It is ORDERED that Odens petition for attorneys fees and costs (Doc. 158) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, such that Oden is awarded from the Defendant $95,725.25 in attorneys fees and $5,408.21 in costs; and that Jeffersons petition for attorneys fees and costs (Doc. 157) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, such that Jefferson is awarded from Plaintiff Oden $20,829.84 in attorneys fees and expenses from the amounts awarded to Oden in this action. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 8/9/2013. (mca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
