Branch Banking and Trust Company v. The Inn at Dauphin Island, L.L.C. et al
| Branch Banking and Trust Company |
| The Inn at Dauphin Island, L.L.C., C. Thurmon Bell, John D. Hunter, Jr. and F. Rutherford Smith, Jr. |
| 1:2010cv00498 |
| September 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Sonja F. Bivins |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
ORDER re: 137 response to the Court's order to show cause, which the Court construes as a motion to dismiss defendant C.Thurmon Bell without prejudice. The motion is granted. Bell is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 7/9/2012. (sdb)
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER granting 115 Motion for Summary Judgment. The plaintiff is entitled to judgment on this date against The Inn and Smith in the amount of $2,681,374.40. Judgment shall be entered accordingly by separate order. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 6/26/2012. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER denying the 33 , 35 & 36 Motions to Dismiss the amended complaint. The defendants' motions to dismiss the original complaint, (Docs. 9, 11, 15, 21), whichwas superseded by the first amended complaint, are denied as moot. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 4/13/2011. (tgw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
