Vision Bank v. Lanza et al
Vision Bank |
Louis J. Lanza, III and C. J. Minor |
1:2010cv00628 |
November 12, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Mobile Office |
Mobile |
Bert W. Milling |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 JUDGMENT in favor of Vision Bank against C. J. Minor, Louis J. Lanza, III in the principal amount of $502,151.67, plus accrued interest in theamount of $59,689.82, and $8,199.96 of other charges and fees, for a total amount of $570,041.45,as of August 18, 2011, with interest continuing to accrue on the principal amount from August 18,2011 until the date of this Judgment in the amount of $97.64 per diem.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 12/7/2011. (cmj) |
Filing 41 ORDER granting 40 Motion to Dismiss Count Two (Counting and Inspection) of Plaintiff's Complaint. Count Two is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 11/18/2011. (cmj) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting 30 Motion for partial Summary Judgment filed by Vision Bank. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 11/1/2011. copies to parties. (sdb) |
Filing 34 Order granting 32 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by C. J. Minor, Louis J. Lanza, III. Should the parties not settle their dispute at mediation, responses to 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment due by 10/7/2011. Replies due by 10/14/2011. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/8/2011. copies to parties. (sdb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.