Ford v. Central Loan Administration et al
| Billie Jean Ford |
| Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, Central Loan Administration and Reporting, Ocwen Loan Servicing, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Cenlar Agency, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv00017 |
| January 10, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| William E. Cassady |
| William H. Steele |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 57 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice so that plaintiff may refile in the appropriate state court if she wishes to do so. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 1/31/12. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
47
Order: The 41 MOTION for Leave to File Response Out of Time and the 42 Reply filed by Billie Jean Ford are moot. The 29 Renewed MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by the defendants is granted in part denied in part (as set out). The [46 ] Second Amended Complaint, which was filed without leave of court, is stricken. The 40 MOTION to Amend Complaint is granted. Plaintiff is ordered by 10/26/2011 to file her Second Amended Complaint. Defendants' Rule 12(b) motion or responsive pleading is due 14 days after the filing of the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 10/5/2011. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
