Hines v. Johnson

Hines v. Johnson

Petitioner:	Thomas Curtis Hines
Respondent:	Willie E. Johnson
Case Number:	1:2011cv00648
Filed:	November 16, 2011
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office:	Mobile Office
County:	Mobile
Presiding Judge:	William E. Cassady
Presiding Judge:	William H. Steele
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 28, 2012	Filing 37 JUDGMENT: It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that petitioner's motion to reconsider the denial of a COA (Doc. 23), be and the same hereby is DENIED. Hines is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 9/28/2012. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (tgw)
June 12, 2012	Filing 19 JUDGMENT: it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the present habeas corpus petition be dismissed with prejudice because the petition is an unauthorized second or successive habeas corpus application. Hines is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 6/12/2012. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (tgw)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 28, 2012

Filing 37 JUDGMENT: It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that petitioner's motion to reconsider the denial of a COA (Doc. 23), be and the same hereby is DENIED. Hines is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 9/28/2012. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (tgw)

June 12, 2012

Filing 19 JUDGMENT: it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the present habeas corpus petition be dismissed with prejudice because the petition is an unauthorized second or successive habeas corpus application. Hines is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 6/12/2012. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (tgw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hines v. Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomas Curtis Hines
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Willie E. Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?