Starnes Davis Florie, LLP v. GOS Operator LLC et al
Starnes Davis Florie, LLP |
GOS Operator LLC, Gordon Oaks Healthcare Center, Gordon Oaks Memory Care Community, Gordon Oaks Specialty Care Assisted Living, GOA Operator LLC, GO ATM LLC, Mission Health of Georgia LLC, Bryan Crino and Scott Feuer |
1:2012cv00387 |
June 8, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Mobile Office |
Mobile |
Katherine P. Nelson |
William H. Steele |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER granting 4 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. The proposed Amended Complaint appended to the Motion is deemed to be the operative pleading in this case. The 5 Motion to Remand is granted and this action is remanded to the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 9/5/2012. (tgw) |
Filing 12 Order re: 4 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint & 5 MOTION to Remand. Responses due by 8/13/2012, Replies due by 8/20/2012. The 6 MOTION for Leave to File Affidavits is moot. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 7/30/2012. (tgw) |
Filing 3 Order directing the defendant by 7/17/2012 to file a supplemental memorandum in support of the Notice of Removal re: jurisdiction. Plaintiff's response is due by 7/24/2012. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 7/3/2012. (tgw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.