Downing v. Billy Barnes Enterprises, Inc.

Plaintiff: Tanya T. Downing
Defendant: Billy Barnes Enterprises, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv00435
Filed: July 12, 2012
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Mobile Office
County: Monroe
Presiding Judge: William E. Cassady
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 2, 2013 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion to Compel as further set out; No later than 6/14/13, the plaintiff shall petition for costs and fees associated with this motion to compel and defendant shall respond to that petition nlt 6/21/13; Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 5/2/2013. (mjn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Downing v. Billy Barnes Enterprises, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanya T. Downing
Represented By: Rocco Calamusa, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Billy Barnes Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: Sandy G. Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?