Springleaf Financial Services of Alabama, Inc. v. The F/V Whitewater et al
||Springleaf Financial Services of Alabama, Inc.
||Mary G. Francis, The F/V Whitewater, John M. Francis and John M. Francis, II
||September 10, 2012
||Alabama Southern District Court
||William E. Cassady
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28:1333 Marine-Preferred Ship Mortgage
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 7, 2014
JUDGMENT entered. In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on December 9, 2013 (Doc. 70), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 61) is GRANTED. The plaintiff is entitle d to recover $65,010.67 under the Loan Agreement. However, the in personam defendants are entitled to an offset in the amount of $30,000.00, as explained in the Court's memorandum opinion and order (Doc. 70). Accordingly, final judgmen t shall be entered against the in personam defendants in the amount of $35,010.671 with post-judgment interest to accrue at the rate of 0.13% from this date forward. Each party shall bear his, her, or its own costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 1/7/2014. (eec)
|June 17, 2013
ORDER entered. The Court GRANTS the substitute custodian's motion (Doc. 33). His expenses have been determined to be expenses in custodia legis. And the plaintiff and the defendants are ordered to pay ESM $7,953.66, plus $94 per day for every day after April 9, 2013, until the date upon which ESM delivers possession in accordance with further order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 6/14/2013. (eec)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?