Duranceau v. Oliver

Petitioner: John P. Duranceau
Respondent: Tray Oliver
Case Number: 1:2012cv00600
Filed: September 18, 2012
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Mobile Office
County: Mobile
0 Judge: Charles R. Butler
1 Judge: Bert W. Milling
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 21, 2013 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED that the habeas petition be DENIED and that this action be DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that, if Petitioner files a certificate of appealability, then it be denied as he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Butler, Jr on 2/21/2013. copy mailed to petitioner. (sdb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Duranceau v. Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tray Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John P. Duranceau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?