Northstar Marine, Inc. v. Huffman et al
| Northstar Marine, Inc. |
| Huffman Construction, Inc. and Michael Huffman |
| 1:2013cv00037 |
| January 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| William H. Steele |
| Bert W. Milling |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
Order on non-jury trial held 11/19/2014, as set out. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 1/6/2015. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER granting 94 Motion for Leave to File Surreply; denying 89 Motion in Limine Concerning Text Messages. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 11/13/2014. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 52 Motion for Summary Judgment. All claims against defendant Michael Huffman are dismissed, and the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Michael Huffman as a defendant. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 9/29/2014. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER denying 69 Motion to Consolidate. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 8/21/2014. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER denying 72 Motion for Reconsideration and Request for Hearing. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 8/8/2014. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER denying 49 Motion to Amend Answer as set out. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 7/28/2014. (mpp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
