Allen et al v. The City of Evergreen, Alabama et al
| Dan Allen, Bobby Watkins and Alberta Lee |
| Pete Wolff, III, Luther Upton, Maxine Harris, The City of Evergreen, Alabama, John Skinner, Jr., Diane Skipper, Vivian Fountain and Becky B. Robinson |
| 1:2013cv00107 |
| March 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Conecuh |
| Callie V. S. Granade |
| Bert W. Milling |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER DENYING Plf's 55 Motion for Further Relief as to Certain Absentee Ballots as set out. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 6/11/2013. (tot)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER, telephonic hearings held 4/25/2013 & 4/29/2013. Defendants' 48 Motion to alter or amend is GRANTED. The date for the municipal election for the City of Evergreen is hereby scheduled for June 18, 2013. Parties will hereafter abide by all additional dates for the election and any needed run-off election as set out in the Special Master's affidavit attached to motion (Doc. 48-1), with exception that notice of the election will begin on 5/2/2013, rather than 4/25/2013. The qualifying period for candidates ended on 4/8/2013, and will not be re-opened. (copy to Special Master). Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 4/29/2013. (mab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
