Stallworth et al v. Rai-Cho
||Guyoung Tech USA, Inc. and Jo Rai-Cho
||April 18, 2013
||Alabama Southern District Court
||Kristi K. DuBose
||Katherine P. Nelson
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Jobs
|Cause of Action:
||42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 2, 2014
ORDER re 32 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment - the motion is granted as to Count I against defendant Guyoung Tech USA, LLC. Stallworth's remaining state law claims against the defendants as set forth in Counts III through VII of the Amended Complaint are dismissed without prejudice; denying 46 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 5/30/14. (cmj)
|June 2, 2014
JUDGMENT entered that Plaintiff Tanisha Stallworths claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of1964, as amended, are dismissed with prejudice and JUDGMENT is entered in favor ofdefendant Guyoung Tech USA, Inc. and against plaintiff Tanish a Stallworth as to Count I of theamended complaint; and Stallworths state law claims against defendants Jin Rae Cho andGuyoung Tech USA, Inc., are dismissed without prejudice and the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 5/30/14. (cmj)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.