Hollingsworth v. Thomas et al
| Richard Hollingsworth |
| Kim T. Thomas, Gary Hetzel, Ronzella Howard, Brandon Carroll and Robert Byrd |
| 1:2013cv00480 |
| October 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Sonja F. Bivins |
| William H. Steele |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the Court's order and to prosecute this action. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 9/16/2016. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
25
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff's claims againstDefendants Carroll and Byrd be dismissed without prejudice from this action, prior to service of process, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 8/22/2014. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
12
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff's claims againstDefendants Carroll and Byrd be dismissed without prejudice from this action, prior to service of process, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 5/30/2014. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
