Nodd v. Integrated Airline Services, Inc.

Plaintiff: Zina B. Nodd
Defendant: Integrated Airline Services, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00598
Filed: December 5, 2013
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Mobile Office
County: Mobile
Presiding Judge: Callie V. S. Granade
Referring Judge: Katherine P. Nelson
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 21, 2014 37 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as set out. Plf's 25 Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED, & Dft's 18 , 20 Motions to Dismiss are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to file the second amended complaint attached to Plf's Motion (Doc. 25). Dft's responsive pleading should be filed NLT 9/4/14. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 8/21/2014. (tot)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nodd v. Integrated Airline Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Integrated Airline Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zina B. Nodd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?