John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) v. Allen et al
| John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) |
| Ursula C. Allen and Carla L. Walker |
| 1:2013cv00613 |
| December 16, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Sonja F. Bivins |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER finding as moot 47 Motion to Strike with respect to the Carla Walker Affidavit and denied in all other respects; granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 12/22/2014. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER denying 37 Motion for Joinder. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 10/28/2014. Copy mailed to Frank Kruse, Esq. as set out. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
40
Order finding as MOOT 36 MOTION for Leave to File Joinder of Necessary Party filed by Carla L. Walker. Denying 38 MOTION to Stay Proceedings. Any REPLY to the 37 Amended MOTION for Leave to File Joinder of Necessary Party due by 10/7/2014. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 10/2/2014. copies to parties. (sdb)
|
|
Filing
35
Order granting 29 MOTION Motion to Discharge. John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) is dismissed and discharged with prejudice from this action & from further liability or obligations to defendants. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 9/19/2014. (tgw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
