Warhurst v. One Twenty Foot Bertran
Earnest E. Warhurst, Jr. |
One Twenty Foot Bertran and David L Jones |
David L Jones |
Earnest E. Warhurst, Jr. |
1:2014cv00245 |
June 3, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Mobile Office |
Mobile |
Katherine P. Nelson |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 84 ORDER denying 74 Motion for Bond; denying 79 Motion to Stay execution; plaintiff is to show cause by 5/1/15 why the defendant's motion for writ of execution should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 4/24/2015. (srr) |
Filing 70 ORDER that a bench trial was held 12/30/14 before the undersigned; the court finds in favor of Defendant/Counterclaimant David Jones as to the claim for damages, in the amount of, $5,505.00, consisting of $3,055.00 in unpaid repair bills an d $2,450.00 in storage fees. The substitute custodian, Sportsman Marine, is ORDERED to immediately release to Plaintiff Eugene Warhurst the vessel bearing Alabama Registration No. AL8238LM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 3/13/2015. (srr) |
Filing 61 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 54 Motion to Supplement; denying 57 Motion to Supplement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 11/7/2014. (srr) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting 36 Motion to Amend Answer to Counterclaim; Plaintiff's Notice of Expert Disclosure 37 is STRICKEN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 9/15/2014. (srr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.