Cieutat v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company

Plaintiff: Mary Anne Cieutat
Defendant: Wright National Flood Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2015cv00380
Filed: July 28, 2015
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Mobile Office
County: Baldwin
Referring Judge: Katherine P. Nelson
Presiding Judge: William H. Steele
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:4072
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 4, 2015 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss. The motion is granted with respect to any claim for attorney's fees, pre-judgment interest or costs. Those claims are dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 11/4/2015. (tgw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cieutat v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Anne Cieutat
Represented By: James E. Robertson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wright National Flood Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?