Longmire v. City of Mobile, Alabama et al
| Carla Longmire |
| City of Mobile, Alabama, Sandy S. Stimpson, James Barber, Joseph F. Kennedy, Donald Dees and Mobile County Personnel Board |
| 1:2016cv00025 |
| January 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| William H. Steele |
| Bert W. Milling |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER denying 64 Motion to Alter or Amend. Signed by District Judge William H. Steele on 5/16/2017. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
63
JUDGMENT: It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that plaintiff shall have and takenothing, and that this action be, and the same hereby is, dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge William H. Steele on 4/10/2017. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying 27 Motion to Amend Answer; denying 33 Motion to Strike. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 1/5/2017. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 12 Motion for Summary Judgment. All claims asserted against Dees in his individual capacity for monetary damages are dismissed under principles of qualified immunity. All claims asserted against Dees in his official capacity are dismissed as unnecessary and redundant. The 23 Motion for Leave to File Surrebuttal is granted. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 10/26/2016. (tgw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
