Developers Surety and Indemnity Company v. Independent Living Center Building Co., Inc.
| Developers Surety and Indemnity Company |
| Independent Living Center Building Co., Inc. |
| Independent Living Center Building Co., Inc. |
| Developers Surety and Indemnity Company and Renew Maintenance & Construction, Inc. |
| 1:2016cv00430 |
| August 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Katherine P. Nelson |
| William H. Steele |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
ORDER re: 122 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice as Between Renew Maintenance and Construction, Inc. and Independent Living Center Building Co., Inc. This case is DISMISSED W/PREJUDICE w/each party to bear their own attorneys' fees & costs. Pretrial conference scheduled for 10/18/18 & trial scheduled for the November 2018 term are CANCELLED, & the Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 10/12/18. (tot)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER denying 91 Motion to Enforce Settlement. Signed by District Judge William H. Steele on 2/9/2018. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim. Count II is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 11/14/2016. (tgw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
