Bowens v. Coty, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Carrie Bowens
Defendant: Coty, Inc., The Proctor & Gamble Company, Inc., The Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company, Inc., The Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLC and Procter & Gamble Hair Care, LLC
Case Number: 1:2017cv00192
Filed: May 2, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office: Mobile Office
County: Mobile
Presiding Judge: P. Bradley Murray
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 15:2301
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting 23 Motion to Consolidate. Lead Case No.: 16-622-WS-B, Member Case No.: 17-192-MU, All future pleadings to be filed in the Lead Case. The Clerk is directed to extract document 20 in 17-0192-MU and to make the documents a part of 16-622. Signed by District Judge William H. Steele on 5/16/2017. (tgw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bowens v. Coty, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carrie Bowens
Represented By: W. Lewis Garrison, Jr.
Represented By: K. Stephen Jackson
Represented By: Brandy Lee Robertson
Represented By: Joseph L. Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coty, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey B. Cannon, Jr.
Represented By: Hugh Cannon Lawley
Represented By: Walter J. Price, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Proctor & Gamble Company, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey B. Cannon, Jr.
Represented By: Hugh Cannon Lawley
Represented By: Walter J. Price, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey B. Cannon, Jr.
Represented By: Hugh Cannon Lawley
Represented By: Walter J. Price, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLC
Represented By: Jeffrey B. Cannon, Jr.
Represented By: Hugh Cannon Lawley
Represented By: Walter J. Price, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Procter & Gamble Hair Care, LLC
Represented By: Jeffrey B. Cannon, Jr.
Represented By: Hugh Cannon Lawley
Represented By: Walter J. Price, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?