Drinkard v. Oliver et al
| Napoleon Drinkard |
| Sheriff Cochran and Warden Trey Oliver |
| 1:2018cv00449 |
| October 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
| P Bradley Murray |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Order Directing Clerk to Serve copy of 2254 petition and order on Respondent and Attorney General if the $5.00 filing fee is paid by 12/26/2018. Respondent to answer within 60 days of service on AG as further set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 12/4/2018. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (tgw)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Napoleon Drinkard - Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray (PSU) (tgw) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of filing Quo Warranto Actions by Napoleon Drinkard - Ref to MJ/Murray (PSU) (tgw) |
| Filing 3 Letter to the Court from Napoleon Drinkard regarding payment of filing fee - Ref to MJ/Murray (PSU) (tgw) |
|
Filing 2
Order directing Petitioner to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees by 11/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 10/18/2018. Copy of Order & IFP motion mailed to Petitioner. (tgw)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Napoleon Drinkard. Ref to MJ/Murray (PSU) (srd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
