Shoots v. Saul
| Lakeisha Michele Shoots |
| Andrew Saul |
| 1:2019cv00589 |
| August 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
| P Bradley Murray |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RETURN OF SERVICE executed re: SS Complaint served 10/1/2019 as to US Attorney General (cmj) |
| Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE of Summons & Complaint served 09/27/2019 as to Social Security Administration. (srd) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed. US Attorney's Office served on 9/26/2019, answer due 12/25/2019. (srd) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Holly Lee Wiseman on behalf of Andrew Saul (Wiseman, Holly) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul 70180680000106629233, U.S. Attorney 70180680000106629240 and U.S. Attorney General70180680000106629257. (cmj) |
Filing 6
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER entered; Answer due within 90 days after service; Plaintiff's Brief due 30 days thereafter.. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 9/23/19. (copy mailed to plaintiff) (cmj)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and directing Clerk to serve. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 9/20/19. (copy mailed to plaintiff) (cmj)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Lakeisha Michele Shoots. Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray. (cmj) |
|
Filing 3
ENDORSED ORDER striking #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs because Plaintiff did not file her motion on this Court's form. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file her motion to proceed without prepayment of fees on this Court's form or to pay the required filing fee on or before September 25, 2019. If the fully completed form or the filing fee is not received by that date, Plaintiff's action may be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order and this Court's Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 8/28/19. (lto)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Lakeisha Michele Shoots. Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray. (cmj) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Lakeisha Michele Shoots; ref to Judge Murray. (cmj) |
| Copy of doc. 3 and IFP form mailed to plaintiff (cmj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shoots v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Holly Lee Wiseman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lakeisha Michele Shoots | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
