Wilson v. Stonkoski et al
| Daniel MacAuther Wilson |
| Clark Stankoski, Tommy Lee Perdue and Daniel Hudson |
| 1:2019cv00956 |
| November 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Kristi K DuBose |
| Katherine P Nelson |
| Prisoner: Prison Conditions |
| 42:1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Order GRANTING Plaintiff an extension to file the motion to proceed without prepayment of fees, or pay the $400.00 filing fee by 1/20/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 12/19/2019. (Copy of this order, order-doc. 3 and IFP form mailed to plaintiff as directed) (nah)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to re-file his Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or pay the $400.00 filing fee by 12/16/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 11/14/2019. (Copy of Order and IFP form mailed to Plaintiff) (nah)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Daniel MacAuther Wilson - Referred to Judge Katherine P. Nelson (PSU). (nah) |
| Filing 1 1983 COMPLAINT against Daniel Hudson, Tommy Lee Perdue, Clark Stankoski, filed by Daniel MacAuther Wilson - Ref to MJ/Nelson (PSU). (nah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
