Young v. Marshall
Huguette Nicole Young |
Alabama Attorney Gen Steve Marshall and Steve Marshall |
1:2020cv00495 |
October 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
P Bradley Murray |
Constitutional - State Statute |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that the #1 Complaint and #3 Amended Complaint be denied without prejudice, prior to service pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Objections to R&R due 14 days from the date of service of this document. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 12/4/20. (plaintiff receives email) (cmj) |
REFERRAL OF #3 Amended Complaint to Judge Beaverstock. (cmj) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Steve Marshall, filed by Huguette Nicole Young. (Young, Huguette) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Huguette Nicole Young. Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray. (cmj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( IFP.), filed by All Plaintiffs. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 1/5/2021. (Attachments: # 1 IFP dockted at #2 (2) Supplement Summons, #3 Supplement Marshals Service Form 285, #4 Supplement Motion for Speedy Hearing Under Rule 57) (Young, Huguette) Modified on 10/13/2020 (cmj). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/13/2020: #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (cmj). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.