Shark Tech LLC v. Gagnon et al
| Shark Tech d/b/a Metal Shark Alabama and Shark Tech LLC doing business as Metal Shark Alabama |
| Dean Gagnon |
| Nicole Gagnon |
| 1:2021cv00279 |
| June 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Callie V S Granade |
| Bert W Milling |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed A. Clay Rankin III, Counsel by Shark Tech LLC. All Defendants (Rankin, A.)
|
|
Filing 5
Service Notice issued 7/2/2021. Plaintiff's notice of service attempts due by 8/2/2021 pursuant to Civil L.R. 4(a)(3). (mab)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Dean Gagnon, Nicole Gagnon. (NOTE TO COUNSEL: The Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service.) (tot)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Filing Proposed Summons by Shark Tech LLC as to Nicole Gagnon. (Rankin, A.) Modified on 6/23/2021 (tot).
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Filing Proposed Summons by Shark Tech LLC as to Dean Gagnon. (Rankin, A.) Modified on 6/23/2021 (tot).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Shark Tech d/b/a Metal Shark Alabama ( Filing fee $402 receipt number AALSDC-2824967, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Shark Tech d/b/a Metal Shark Alabama. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 9/16/2021. (Rankin, A.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
