Lee v. R&L Management
| Lauquasia Lee |
| R&L Management doing business as The Candy Store |
| 1:2021cv00338 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| P Bradley Murray |
| William H Steele |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER on #9 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by R&L Management. A review does not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require recusal in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 9/8/21. (cmj)
|
| Filing 10 Document endorsed NOTED by District Judge William H. Steele: Corporate Disclosure Statement #9 filed by R&L Management. (Steele, William) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendants R&L Management, Jennifer Ritter, Ritters Critters, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Jennifer Ritter, Other Affiliate Ritters Critters, Inc. for R&L Management.. (McClurkin, Anne) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by R&L Management. (McClurkin, Anne) |
| Answer due from R&L Management on 9/7/2021. (cmj) |
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by District Judge William H. Steele on 8/24/2021. (Steele, William)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Judge Steele (cmj) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by All Defendants. (McClurkin, Anne) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lauquasia Lee. R&L Management served on 8/2/2021, answer due 8/23/2021 (Poynter, Virginia) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to R&L Management. Note to Counsel: The Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service. (cmj) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons by Lauquasia Lee (Poynter, Virginia) |
|
Filing 2
Service Order entered 8/2/2021. Plaintiff to notify the Court the action taken to effect service and the results thereof. Service order deadline set to 9/13/2021.. Signed by District Judge William H. Steele on 8/2/21. (cmj)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number BALSDC-2846659, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by All Plaintiffs. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 10/27/2021. (Poynter, Virginia) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/2/2021: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (cmj). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lee v. R&L Management | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lauquasia Lee | |
| Represented By: | Virginia Broadway Poynter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: R&L Management doing business as The Candy Store | |
| Represented By: | Anne Laurie McClurkin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
