Double AA Construction Company, LLC v. XL Specialty Insurance Company
Double AA Construction Company, LLC |
XL Specialty Insurance Company |
1:2021cv00392 |
September 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Terry F Moorer |
P Bradley Murray |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
REFERRAL OF #8 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting to Judge Murray. (mab) |
Filing 10 Order re: #8 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Scheduling Conference, by telephone, set for 11/10/2021 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray as set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 10/27/21. (tot) |
Filing 9 Notice of Filing Requests for Admission, Interrogatories, and Requests for Production to Defendant filed by Double AA Construction Company, LLC. (George, Christopher) |
Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Zarzour, Jessica) |
Filing 7 PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 10/14/21. (Attachment: #1 Consent to Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge) (tot) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Exhibit A to #2 ANSWER to Complaint by XL Specialty Insurance Company. (Zarzour, Jessica) Modified on 10/5/2021 (tot). |
Filing 5 NOTICE by XL Specialty Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Zarzour, Jessica) |
Filing 4 Order review of #3 Disclosure Statement filed by XL Specialty Insurance Company has not revealed any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 9/13/2021. (mab) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendants XL Specialty Insurance Company, XL Reinsurance America Inc., XL Group Ltd., AXA SA, AXA XL Group identifying Corporate Parent XL Reinsurance America Inc., Corporate Parent XL Group Ltd., Corporate Parent AXA SA, Corporate Parent AXA XL Group for XL Specialty Insurance Company.. (Zarzour, Jessica) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by XL Specialty Insurance Company. (Zarzour, Jessica) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL , filed by XL Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3) (Zarzour, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Double AA Construction Company, LLC v. XL Specialty Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Double AA Construction Company, LLC | |
Represented By: | Christopher L. George |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: XL Specialty Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Jessica Breanne Stanley Zarzour |
Represented By: | William E. Shreve, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.