Davis v. Dream Big, Inc.
| Howard Davis |
| Dream Big, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00023 |
| January 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Sonja F Bivins |
| Terry F Moorer |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER, GRANTING Defendant's #7 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, and EXTENDING deadline to 3/31/2022. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 3/11/2022. (mab)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Caleb William Diaz on behalf of Dream Big, Inc. (Diaz, Caleb) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time To Respond To Complaint Referred to Judge Terry F. Moorer. (mab) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Dream Big, Inc.. (Peake, John) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time To Respond To Complaint filed by Dream Big, Inc.. (Peake, John) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Howard Davis. Dream Big, Inc. served on 2/17/2022, answer due 3/10/2022 (Lowery, Courtney) |
| Filing 5 This action has been transferred from the docket of Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins and is now assigned to the docket of District Judge Terry F. Moorer and Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins. To insure that your pleadings are referred to the proper Judge and Magistrate Judge with as little delay as possible, please use the letter suffix TFM-B after the case number on all future pleadings. (mpp) Copies to counsel |
|
Filing 4
Service Order entered 1/25/2022. Plaintiff to notify the Court the action taken to effect service and the results thereof. Service order deadline set to 3/7/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 1/25/22. (mpp) Copy to Pltf
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Assignment to Magistrate Judge for trial. (Attachments: #1 Request for Reassignment) (mpp) Copy to Pltf |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Dream Big, Inc.. Note to Counsel: The Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service. (mpp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dream Big, Inc. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number AALSDC-2948025, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Howard Davis. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 4/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Consent to Join -- Howard Davis, #3 Exhibit Summons for Defendant Dream Big, Inc.) (Lowery, Courtney) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Dream Big, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Davis | |
| Represented By: | Courtney Lowery |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dream Big, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Caleb William Diaz |
| Represented By: | John Day Peake, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
