James v. Raybon et al
| Joe Nathan James, Jr. |
| Terry Raybon, John Hamm and Steve Marshall |
| 1:2022cv00285 |
| July 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Terry F Moorer |
| Katherine P Nelson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Mail Returned as to Alabama Department of Corrections re: #3 Order. (Referred to J/Moorer on 8/17/22) (tot)
|
|
Filing 9
Return of Service Executed, John Hamm served on 7/25/2022, answer due 8/15/2022; Steve Marshall served on 7/25/2022, answer due 8/15/2022; Terry Raybon served on 7/25/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. (tot)
|
|
Filing 13
RETURN OF SERVICE of #8 Memorandum Opinion & Order served 7/27/22 as to Joe Nathan James, Jr. (tot)
|
|
Filing 12
RETURN OF SERVICE of #3 Order served 7/25/22 as to Terry Raybon & Joe Nathan James. (tot)
|
|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER, Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED as set out. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion & Order to Plf by overnight mail & to send a copy to the Warden, by either electronic mail or facsimile, w/instructions that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion & Order be given to Plf immediately upon receipt. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 7/25/22. (copy to Plf by UPS overnight mail on 7/25/22; e-mailed to Warden Raybon & his assistant on 7/19/22) (tot) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/27/2022: #1 UPS Tracking Information) (meh). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/17/2022: #2 UPS Overnight Receipt) (tot).
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Henry Mitchell Johnson on behalf of John Hamm, Steve Marshall, Terry Raybon (Johnson, Henry)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to John Hamm, Steve Marshall, Terry Raybon. (Attachment: #1 USPS Banner Pages) (tot)
|
|
Filing 5
Objection re: #1 Complaint . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Anderson, Richard)
|
|
Filing 11
RETURN OF SERVICE of #3 Order served 7/21/22 as to John Hamm, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections. (tot)
|
|
Filing 10
RETURN OF SERVICE of #3 Order served 7/21/22 as to Steve Marshall, Alabama Attorney General. (tot)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Dearman Anderson on behalf of John Hamm, Steve Marshall, Terry Raybon (Anderson, Richard)
|
|
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Joe Nathan James, Jr. (SEE DOCS. #1 & #3 ) (tot)
|
|
Filing 3
Order GRANTING #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joe Nathan James, Jr. It is ORDERED that the Court is treating the #1 Complaint as one containing a request for Preliminary Injunction. Defendants shall file a response to the Preliminary Injunction on or before 5:00 p.m. on 7/22/2022. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this information to Defendants by overnight expedited mail. Copy to Plaintiff and Defendants by overnight mail in addition to the normal means of service. Email to Defendants for notification purposes. Copy to Account Manager at Holman. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 7/20/2022. (meh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/11/2022: #1 UPS Overnight Receipts) (tot).
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joe Nathan James, Jr. Referred to Judge Terry F. Moorer. (fz)
|
|
Filing 1
1983 COMPLAINT against John Hamm, Steve Marshall, Terry Raybon, filed by Joe Nathan James, Jr. Referred to Judge Moorer. (fz)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
