Hagerty Consulting, Inc. v. Baldwin County Commission
Hagerty Consulting, Inc. |
Baldwin County Commission |
1:2022cv00373 |
September 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
P Bradley Murray |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 REPLY to #9 MOTION to Dismiss , #14 Reply to Response to Motion (Sur-Reply) filed by Hagerty Consulting, Inc.. (Strasavich, Michael) |
Filing 16 ENDORSED ORDER granting #15 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Surreply to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's surreply must be limited to responding to any new arguments or authorities cited in Defendant's reply brief only. Plaintiff's surreply must be filed on or before November 15, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 11/8/22. (lto) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Hagerty Consulting, Inc.. (Strasavich, Michael) |
Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion #9 Baldwin County Commission's Reply to Hagerty Consulting, Inc.'s Response to Baldwin County Commission's Motion to Dismiss filed by Baldwin County Commission. (Irvine, George) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Hagerty Consulting, Inc.. (Strasavich, Michael) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by John Bradford Boyd Hicks on behalf of Baldwin County Commission (Hicks, John) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Tyler Thull on behalf of All Defendants (Thull, Tyler) |
Filing 10 TEXT-ONLY ORDER: On October 17, 2022, Defendant Baldwin County Commission filed a motion to dismiss this action. (Doc. 9). Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a response to Defendant's motion on or before October 31, 2022. Defendant is ORDERED to file its reply, if any, on or before November 7, 2022, at which time the Court will take the motion under submission. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 10/18/22. (lto) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Baldwin County Commission. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Brief In Support of Defendants Motion to Dismiss) (Irvine, George) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hagerty Consulting, Inc.. Baldwin County Commission served on 9/22/2022, answer due 10/13/2022 (Strasavich, Michael) |
Filing 7 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: A review of the Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 filed by Plaintiff Hagerty Consulting, Inc. reveals no reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (lto) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Baldwin County Commission. Note to Counsel: The Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service. (eec) |
Filing 5 Notice of Assignment to Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray for trial. (eec) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Catherine Simon Spann on behalf of Hagerty Consulting, Inc. (Spann, Catherine) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Plaintiff Hagerty Consulting, Inc.. (Strasavich, Michael) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons by Hagerty Consulting, Inc. (Strasavich, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Baldwin County Commission ( Filing fee $402 receipt number AALSDC-3073142, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Hagerty Consulting, Inc.. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 12/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Professional Services Contract, #2 Exhibit B-Presentment of Claim, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Strasavich, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.