Kalfus v. Westmoreland
Jack Kalfus |
Kimberly Westmoreland |
1:2024cv00297 |
August 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
Sonja F Bivins |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER Referring Case to Mediation. Selection of Mediator is due within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. Mediation Status due by 12/20/2024. Rule 26 initial disclosures due by 10/31/2024 Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 10/18/24. (mbp) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins: Scheduling Conference held on 10/18/2024. DCR Digital Audio Recording. (srd) |
Filing 9 ORDER setting Rule 16 Conference entered. Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 10/18/2024 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins. (See full order for call-in details.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 10/07/2024. (cjr) |
Filing 8 QUALIFIED HIPAA PROTECTIVE ORDER entered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 10/07/2024. (cjr) |
Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order HIPPA Order) (Bolvig, Christoffer) |
Filing 6 PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/7/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 8/23/2024. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge) (fz) |
Filing 5 Document endorsed NOTED by Chief District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock: Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 filed by Kimberly Westmoreland. A review does not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require recusal in this action. (jil) |
Filing 4 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins: Corporate Disclosure Statement Doc. #3 filed by Kimberly Westmoreland. A review does not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require recusal of the Magistrate Judge in this action. (bld) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Kimberly Westmoreland. (Bolvig, Christoffer) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Kimberly Westmoreland. (Bolvig, Christoffer) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 405, Receipt number AALSDC-3447243, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Errata D) (Bolvig, Christoffer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kalfus v. Westmoreland | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kimberly Westmoreland | |
Represented By: | Christoffer Peter Bolvig, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jack Kalfus | |
Represented By: | Lindsay Ann Hewitt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.