Banks v. Stanoski et al
Deshun Terrell Banks |
J. Clark Stanoski, Baldwin County District Attorney and Baldwin County Attorney General |
1:2025cv00046 |
February 4, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Mobile Office |
Kristi K DuBose |
Katherine P Nelson |
Mandamus & Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 7 Letter from Deshun Terrell Banks, referred to Judge Nelson(PSU). (fz) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Deshun Terrell Banks. Referred to Judge Katherine P. Nelson(PSU). (fz) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Alabama Middle; Case Number 2:25-cv-00086. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
![]() |
Case transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. Electronically transferred via CM/ECF to Clerk. (LAB) [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 2/4/2025.] |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Deshun Terrell Banks. (TPS) [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 2/4/2025.] |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Baldwin County Attorney General, Baldwin County District Attorney, J. Clark Stanoski, filed by Deshun Terrell Banks.(TPS) (Main Document 1 replaced on 1/31/2025) (LAB). [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 2/4/2025.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.