United States of America et al v. Lincare, Inc. et al
2:2019cv00104 |
February 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Selma Office |
Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER DISMISSING CASE re: 46 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Stephanie Strong Blankenship with prejudice as to Plaintiff-Relator Blakenship and without prejudice as to the rights of the United States as set out. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 08/02/202. (srd) |
Filing 35 ORDER ADOPTING 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 25 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Lincare, Inc. It is ORDERED as follows: 1) The Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint is GRANTED as to Counts I, and II, is also GRA NTED as to denial of further leave to amend Counts I and II, and is DENIED as to Count III; 2) the Realtor Blakenship's request for leave to further amend her complaint is DENIED; and 3) Counts I and II are DISMISSED under Rule 12(b)(6) with prejudice as to Realtor Blakenship, but without prejudice as to the the United States as set out. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 02/18/2021. (srd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States of America et al v. Lincare, Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.