Kahle v. NovaGold Resources Inc.

Plaintiff: Michele S. Kahle
Defendant: NovaGold Resources Inc.
Case Number: 2:2009cv00007
Filed: August 26, 2009
Court: Alaska District Court
Office: Nome Office
County: Nome
Presiding Judge: John W. Sedwick
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 17, 2009 36 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 23 Motion; denying 27 Motion for Hearing; denying 31 Motion to Strike; denying 12 Motion to Remand to State Court; denying 18 Motion for Hearing; denying 19 Motion to Strike; granting 21 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge John W. Sedwick on 12/17/09. (GMM, COURT STAFF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kahle v. NovaGold Resources Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michele S. Kahle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NovaGold Resources Inc.
Represented By: Kenneth M. Gutsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?