Crowley v. Boothe
Plaintiff: Robert S. Crowley
Defendant: Michael Boothe
Case Number: 3:2013cv00106
Filed: June 17, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Alaska
Office: Anchorage Office
County: Anchorage
Presiding Judge: Timothy M. Burgess
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER REGARDING RES JUDICATA: RE 55 Motion to Strike is GRANTED; Dockets 54 and 54-1 are hereby STRICKEN. RE 58 Motion to Accept is GRANTED. Defendants should immediately file their Motion to Dismiss; Response due 21 days after service; reply due 14 days after service of response. (See order for full details). Signed by Judge Timothy M. Burgess on 12/17/2014. (CME, COURT STAFF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crowley v. Boothe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Boothe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert S. Crowley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?