Shorty v. Houser
Petitioner: Patrick Leo Shorty
Respondent: Earl L. Houser
Case Number: 3:2019cv00223
Filed: August 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Alaska
Presiding Judge: James K Singleton
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2019 Filing 3 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT - CJA 23 by Patrick Leo Shorty. (PXS, COURT STAFF) Modified on 8/16/2019 to Create relationship to document #2 (PXS, COURT STAFF).
August 15, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Patrick Leo Shorty.(PXS, COURT STAFF) Modified on 8/16/2019 to correct date filed (PXS, COURT STAFF).
August 15, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28:2254, filed by Patrick Leo Shorty.(PXS, COURT STAFF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shorty v. Houser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Earl L. Houser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Patrick Leo Shorty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?