Copeland v. Robert et al
| Roger Copeland |
| Elisia Kupris, John H. Robert, III and Jessica Leeah |
| 3:2021cv00102 |
| April 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Sharon L Gleason |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 6/8/21. (JLH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Complaint, at Docket #1 , is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This dismissal will count as a STRIKE against Mr. Copeland. The Application to Waive Prepayment of the Filing Fee, at Docket #4 , is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 6/8/21. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 4 Prisoner's Application to Waive Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Roger Copeland.(LMH, COURT STAFF) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER RE: DEFICIENT FILING: Filing fee of $402.00 or application to waive prepayment of the filing due within 30 days. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 4/28/21. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 2 Letter received on 4/26/21 from Roger Copeland. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Elisia Kupris, Jessica Leeah, John H. Robert, III, filed by Roger Copeland. (Attachments: #1 Letter Office of Children's Services, #2 Order of Dismissal OAH No. 18-0417-SAN)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
