Nordlund v. Beesley et al
David Christopher Nordlund |
Tigner and Beesley |
3:2021cv00134 |
June 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Alaska |
Ralph R Beistline |
Sharon L Gleason |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 RRB TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal at #8 is accepted. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), the Court dismisses the case without prejudice.(SDW, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by David Christopher Nordlund. (JLH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Consideration/Clarification by David Christopher Nordlund.(JLH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by David Christopher Nordlund (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
![]() |
Filing 4 SLG TEXT ORDER: By agreement of the judges, the above referenced case is hereby reassigned to the Honorable Ralph R. Beistline for all further proceedings. Henceforth, parties to use the following case caption for all future filings in 3:21-cv-00134-RRB. (SDW, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Christopher Nordlund. (Attachments: #1 Account Statement)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Beesley, Tigner, filed by David Christopher Nordlund. (Attachments: #1 1)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.