Greene v. United Parcel Service Inc. et al
Dwight Greene |
United Parcel Service Inc. and UPSCO United Parcel Service Co. |
3:2022cv00126 |
May 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Alaska |
Joshua M Kindred |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by UPSCO United Parcel Service Co., United Parcel Service Inc.. (Fisher, Gregory) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by UPSCO United Parcel Service Co., United Parcel Service Inc..(Fisher, Gregory) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Dwight Greene. (Attachments: #1 Dismissal and Notice of Rights Letter)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff shall submit a copy of his Notice of Rights letter from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission within 30 days. Signed by Judge Joshua M. Kindred on 6/6/22. (RMC, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dwight Greene.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Dwight Greene re #1 Complaint (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Employment Discrimination against UPSCO United Parcel Service Co., United Parcel Service Inc., filed by Dwight Greene. (Attachments: #1 Wrongful Termination Demands, #2 AERC Letters)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.