Soto-Valdez v. Adams

Plaintiff: Castulo Soto-Valdez
Defendant: Michael Adams
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:1999cv01591
Filed: September 2, 1999
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Lawrence O Anderson
Presiding Judge: Robert C Broomfield
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 19, 2013 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER, United States Magistrate Judge Anderson's Report and Recommendation 12 is adopted; accordingly, Petitioner Castulo Soto-Valdez's Motion for Relief from Judgment Under Rule 60(b)(6) 1 is denied; Petitioner Castulo Soto-Valdez' ;s Motion to Supplement Pending Rule 60(b) Motion with New Decision by the United States Supreme Court that Would Support Petitioner's Rule 60(b) Motion 11 is granted to the extent that the Court considered Petitioner's arguments therein; Petitioner Castulo Soto-Valdez's Motion to Supplement Pending Motion Under Rule 60(b)(6) with Recent Circuit Law 14 is granted to the extent that the Court considered Petitioner's arguments therein; Petitioner Castulo Soto-Vadlez's Motion for Disposition on Pending Motion Under Rule 60(b)(6) 18 is denied as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 9/18/13. (REW)
July 27, 2012 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER, Respondent, the United States of America, shall file a response to movant's Motion to Supplement 14 , addressing the recently decided cases referenced therein and there applicability, if any, to the issues presently before the court in m ovant's motion for relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6); Respondent's response shall be filed no later than 15 days from the date of entry of this order; and movant's reply, if any, shall be filed no later than 10 days from the date of entry and service of the response. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 7/27/12. (REW)
May 6, 2011 2 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER the parties and the Clerk of the Court shall file all documents related to this matter in the civil case; The United States Attorney for the District of Arizona has sixty (60) days from the date of this Order to file and serve a response to thi s motion. Petitioner may file a reply within thirty (30) days from the date of service of the response; This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 05/06/11. (ESL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Soto-Valdez v. Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Castulo Soto-Valdez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Brian Gail Larson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?