Scottsdale Insurance v. Market Finders Ins

Case Number: 2:2004cv00118
Filed: January 20, 2004
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
Presiding Judge: Stephen M McNamee
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 17, 2008 157 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 146 Defendant's BILL OF COSTS with leave to refile after resolution of the appeal. Defendant may reinstate its motion at the proper time by filing a Notice of Renewal of Bill of Costs; Defendant need not refile the Bill of Costs itself. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 10/17/08. (LSP)
October 15, 2008 156 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 148 Defendant's Motion for Attorney Fees with leave to renew the motion after resolution of the appeal. Defendant may reinstate its motion at the proper time by filing a Notice of Renewal of Motion for Attorneys' Fees; Defendant need not refile the motion itself. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 10/14/08.(LSP)
September 12, 2008 144 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER granting Defendant's 128 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this matter. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 09/11/08.(DNH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scottsdale Insurance v. Market Finders Ins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?